Here is an example:
In 2015, the fed gov increased UCCB $60/m per child, since it's taxable income, you need to include it in your income or assign it to your child, however the big surprise change is that "The amount for children under 18 years of age has been eliminated and replaced by the enhanced universal child care benefit" . Basically, you are given $60 before tax, but if you have tax payable, you also lost a tax credit of $28, in total you get less than $32 per month. Of course, for lower income parents they may have net $60, but do they really like this option of this $60 or $28 comparing to higher income parents, if they could have more income by say two thousand dollars per month?
下面是一个例子:
在2015年,Canada 联邦政府 给父母每个孩子$60 /月 的 UCCB,你需要把它列入你的收入,或将其分配给你的孩子,然而令人大跌眼镜的变化是,“18岁以下儿童税收抵免被增强的托儿津贴所取代”。基本上,您将得到个税前$60,但如果你有应纳税额,你也失去了税收抵免$28,你实得到少于$32。当然,对于收入较低的家长他们可能有净入$60,但他们是否真的喜欢这个每月$60 或相对高收入的父母的$28选项,如果他们能有更多的收入譬如说每月两千元?
In 2015, the fed gov increased UCCB $60/m per child, since it's taxable income, you need to include it in your income or assign it to your child, however the big surprise change is that "The amount for children under 18 years of age has been eliminated and replaced by the enhanced universal child care benefit" . Basically, you are given $60 before tax, but if you have tax payable, you also lost a tax credit of $28, in total you get less than $32 per month. Of course, for lower income parents they may have net $60, but do they really like this option of this $60 or $28 comparing to higher income parents, if they could have more income by say two thousand dollars per month?
下面是一个例子:
在2015年,Canada 联邦政府 给父母每个孩子$60 /月 的 UCCB,你需要把它列入你的收入,或将其分配给你的孩子,然而令人大跌眼镜的变化是,“18岁以下儿童税收抵免被增强的托儿津贴所取代”。基本上,您将得到个税前$60,但如果你有应纳税额,你也失去了税收抵免$28,你实得到少于$32。当然,对于收入较低的家长他们可能有净入$60,但他们是否真的喜欢这个每月$60 或相对高收入的父母的$28选项,如果他们能有更多的收入譬如说每月两千元?